Kevin O’Brien discusses how social distancing changes the debate over electronic wills in his latest article on The Recorder. As the COVID-19 virus continues to spread through communities, the prospect of offering people electronic wills, remotely executed and virtually witnessed, has a whole new appeal. Proponents of electronic wills want to bring the low cost and convenience of electronic transactions to the world of estate planning. Allowing consumers to shop for estate planning services online and create and sign wills from the convenience of their homes makes estate planning more accessible and affordable. The risk of fraud and undue influence, the argument goes, is always present in estate planning transactions regardless of the medium used to execute the documents. Any increase in risk is offset by the many advantages technology provides. The COVID-19 pandemic adds a new and weighty argument in support of electronic wills: public health.
Link: https://lnkd.in/dTQH5qe
California recently enacted its decanting statute. The new law allows an authorized fiduciary to modify the terms of an irrevocable trust without the beneficiaries’ consent or court approval. Nevertheless, the settlor’s intent must be preserved, and no beneficiary can object. Here’s how the law compares to the Uniform Trust Decanting Act (UTDA) and other state decanting statutes.
California law has long recognized a settlor’s right to restrict a beneficiary’s use of trust assets. Restraints on alienation, spendthrift clauses, shutdown clauses and wholly discretionary trusts are a few of the tools settlors may use when creating a trust for the benefit of someone likely to have creditor problems.
Congratulations to Margaret M. Hand, named to Best Lawyers in America for 2020. Ms. Hand was also recognized as Lawyer of the Year for achieving the highest overall peer feedback.